Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting an 86.3 score against 75.6. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S10e and the nubia Red Magic 3 were only released 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e has a little bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% larger battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.