Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and notably lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 features a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a processing unit that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, both have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a superior camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Galaxy S20 features a better storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.