Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's general score of 75.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more MP camera.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a greater storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3 features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.