Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a general score of 98 against 75.6. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer and just a little bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3's, although it is a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and nubia Red Magic 3 feature similar CPUs, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same camera sensor size and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with faster video frame rate and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a battery duration that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3 one.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.