Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a overall score of 93.4 against 75.6. The Galaxy S22 is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also a lot lighter and a lot thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has 13 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a more mega-pixels back facing camera, faster 24 frames per second video frame rate and a much larger sensor.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S22 costs more than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.