Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a general score of 95.4 against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3, although it's also a bit heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and more pixels per display inch. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 and the Galaxy S22 Ultra count with extremely similar batteries performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with higher video frame rate, a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.