Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S25's construction is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of display.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a better resolution camera in the back, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has longer battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S25 costs more than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.