Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a 90.7 score against 75.6. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 12 GB RAM.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra's memory for games and applications is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's one, they have equal internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos, a lot higher resolution back camera and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3 and Galaxy S25 Ultra feature similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.