Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-27 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has an overall score of 80.9, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 score. Galaxy S6 Active is a a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a much sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3 features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better CPU than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processor and a graphics processor. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images, a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S6 Active is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.