Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with an 80.1 score against 75.6. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is newer, but extremely thicker and heavier than the nubia Red Magic 3. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as nubia Red Magic 3. If you want to save some money, you can get the nubia Red Magic 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.