Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having an 81 score against 75.6. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is an a little thicker and just a bit heavier phone than the nubia Red Magic 3. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3 and Galaxy XCover Pro both feature quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3 has improved battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.