Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having an 88.5 score against 75.6. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip is a much thinner and lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3, even though both of them were released with only 9 months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's processing unit is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit greater display density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor. The Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's one, they have exactly the same internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.