Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it is also noticeably thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than nubia Red Magic 3, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as nubia Red Magic 3, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger aperture, a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a little more than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.