Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a general score of 79.8 against 75.6. Xperia XZ Premium's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a little better processing power than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a way better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a lot better display pixels density. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much better photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.