Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a 78.8 score against 75.6. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Xperia Z4v has the previous 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite of the fact that the Xperia Z4v is way older than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's design is way lighter and thinner.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 takes much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a lot better video definition, a bigger camera aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a way more mega pixels camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xperia Z4v is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.