Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Red | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
TCL 20 Pro 5G is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a 76.1 score against 75.6. TCL 20 Pro 5G's design is newer, somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the TCL 20 Pro 5G has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 features just a bit better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a same size screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures a bit better pictures and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size sensor and the same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a bigger aperture and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better battery life than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.