Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Red | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has an overall score of 84.5, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3's overall score of 75.6. Xiaomi 14T Pro is a much newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has an older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a lot better display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a just a little higher display pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3 and Xiaomi 14T Pro have quite similar memory for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better processing power than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both have 12 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Xiaomi 14T Pro features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one. Xiaomi 14T Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also has a higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos, better 30 fps video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.