Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 overall score. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark is older than nubia Red Magic 3, it's body is just a bit thinner and lighter. These phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System). Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a way more MP back camera, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.