Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black and Red | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is just a little thicker than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's just a little bit lighter and also newer.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a bit better CPU than nubia Red Magic 3, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a just a little greater screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.