Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-27 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has a score of 78.1, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has 6.0 Marshmallow version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus's body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than nubia Red Magic 3, although it was released many years before.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels amount per inch of display.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Nubia Red Magic 3 takes way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.