Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Red | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a global score of 82.2 against 75.6. These phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Mi 9T is a just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per inch of display.
Nubia Red Magic 3 captures slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a same size back camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.