Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Red | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a global score of 82.7 against 75.6. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3, although they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 48 megapixels back camera, the same back camera sensor size and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.