Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A2 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with a 78 score against 75.6. Xiaomi Mi A2's body is incredibly lighter and way thinner than nubia Red Magic 3, even though it was released only 10 months before. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi A2 counts with a screen that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's display, because although the Xiaomi Mi A2 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a lot higher video resolution and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.