Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black and Red | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a global score of 79.2 against 75.6. Even though Xiaomi Mi A3 and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released only a few months apart, Xiaomi Mi A3 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better video definition and a bigger aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3 has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.