Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has an overall score of 77.5, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's a bit lighter and thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a bit better battery life than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a 6% bigger battery size. The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way more mega pixels camera, a much better video definition and a much larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.