Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-27 | 2016-11-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 3.22 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 590.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2040 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 361 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi MIX is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a global score of 76.2 against 75.6. These phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi MIX has 6.0 Marshmallow version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Mi MIX construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though it was released many years before.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Xiaomi Mi MIX counts with a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3, although it has a bit worse pixels amount in each screen inch, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2040 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution camera, a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a larger camera aperture to capture better images in low light situations. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Mi MIX is also cheaper than the nubia Red Magic 3, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.