Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is just a little heavier than nubia Red Magic 3, it's a bit thinner and newer.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little greater display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.