Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a 78.2 score against 75.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Poco M3 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3, but both are 0.38inches thick.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco M3 features longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same sensor size and the same resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way better video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.