Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Red | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter device than nubia Red Magic 3, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X2 has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a quite worse pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
Xiaomi Poco X2 takes slightly better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos, better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.