Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a score of 81.6 against 75.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's construction has the same weight than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's a bit thinner.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a little bit higher screen pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit superior battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, higher video frame rates and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.