Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite better screen pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher video resolution, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.