Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. LG G8X ThinQ's design is lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were released only 1 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. The LG G8X ThinQ features a superior memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better CPU than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a way higher video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography, a much bigger camera sensor and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.