Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a global score of 92.3 against 75.8. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer, lighter and a lot thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a little better number of pixels in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a CPU that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's processing unit, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has as much memory capacity to install applications and games as nubia Red Magic 3S, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a way higher video definition, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a way higher 48 MP resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.