Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 82.4 against 75.8. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a quite greater screen pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with faster 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro feature extremely similar batteries performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.