Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a somewhat thinner and lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in nubia Red Magic 3S, because although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per screen inch. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processing unit than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures a bit better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery life than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro costs the same than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.