Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is an extremely older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but Apple was able to make it a lot thinner and a little lighter. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels number per inch in the display.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little better processing power than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone 8 Plus features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
IPhone 8 Plus is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.