Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 75.8. The iPhone X body is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. IPhone X features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone X counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as the nubia Red Magic 3S, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Apple iPhone X has a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than iPhone X, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos, a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations, a lot better video resolution and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
IPhone X costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.