Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Apple iPhone XR is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The iPhone XR features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit lower pixels density and a lot worse 828 x 1792px resolution.
IPhone XR counts with a little faster processor than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a larger aperture, a camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 70% bigger battery size.
The Apple iPhone XR costs more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.