Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. IPhone XS is an older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Apple was able to make it lighter and notably thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XS features a little better processing power than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XS features a little bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit greater pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent bigger battery capacity.
The iPhone XS costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.