Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 77.1 score against 75.8. Despite of the fact that Asus ROG Phone is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is thinner and just a bit lighter. Asus ROG Phone has just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Asus ROG Phone counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better CPU than Asus ROG Phone, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery life than Asus ROG Phone, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a lot better video definition, a much larger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Asus ROG Phone, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.