Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-07-12 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe has a general score of 77.5, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe is an a lot older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Asus made it way thinner and notably lighter. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because although it has a bit worse pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe has a better storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a much better video resolution, a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos and a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.