Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 76.2 against 75.8. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom design is much lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little higher display density. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs, a camera with lot more megapixels and a lot better video resolution. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's battery performance is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.