Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a just a little thinner and somewhat lighter device than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released with only 5 months difference. These phones have Android OS, but the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per screen inch. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s battery performance is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes slightly better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and although they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor and the same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.