Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a overall score of 77.4 against 75.8. Despite of the fact that Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System).
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with a little bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a greater camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because it has a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.