Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Google Nexus 6 has the previous 5.1 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Google Nexus 6 is way older and just a little bit thicker than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is still somewhat lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Nexus 6 features a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a way higher video definition, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a really longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 3S. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.