Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 3 design is thinner and notably lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a way better video definition and a bigger aperture. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.