Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 81.9 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat thinner and notably lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were released only a couple of months apart. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher resolution camera and a lot higher video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.