Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were only released with a few months difference. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and more pixels per inch of screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has much more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a camera with much more mega pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.