Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a global score of 82.9 against 75.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 4a is a newer device, and it is also way lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3S has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much more mega pixels back camera, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.