Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is newer, extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.